Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Fernandez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:27, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

Warren Fernandez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

not notable Mohann Jasturba (talk) 01:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Mr Warren Fernandez is merely performing his job at the Straits Times.
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 September 28.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 01:58, 28 September 2016 (UTC)


 * Clearly notable, with quite extensive coverage of his books and journalistic activities available at the click of a mouse. Jonathan A Jones (talk) 08:52, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
 * The problem here is that there are no independent sources. The subject works at SPH and all sources are SPH published or affiliated. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 15:44, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:06, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:27, 6 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of sources indepdent from his employer to establish notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:24, 9 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as he's apparently only best known for being that one newspaper's employee, and then there's nothing else for any actual independent notability and substance. SwisterTwister   talk  23:33, 9 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.