Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Graff


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Ka-Pow!. The consensus here is to keep this article but I'm redirecting per WP:BLP. If someone wants to add sources then the redirect can be reverted (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Warren Graff

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Involvement in Happy Tree Friends isn't enough to pass WP:N without any third party sources. I've found nothing that says he's worked with Sonic Colours, BMX XXX or anything not related to Happy Tree Friends. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:05, 17 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:32, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep and source. In searching, one can find what one wishes to find... or not. Graff has indeed worked on Happy Tree Friends  Also on Ka-Pow! Also on BMX XXX and is working on Sonic Colours Looks like enough is available to bring this article into line... something that can be done through regular editing... and not requiring deletion simply because it hasn't been done yet.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 09:35, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale. The article is a BLP. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Schmidt. Edward321 (talk) 22:01, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.