Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warren Wald


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was NO CONSENSUS. &mdash; J I P  | Talk 06:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Warren Wald
vanity page Asw32 01:23, 23 December 2005 (UTC)


 * delete this international playboy who travels to Yugoslavia MNewnham 01:29, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appeared on Pop Idol with news coverage. -- JJay 02:22, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per JJay Thesquire 05:00, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete wannabe nobody...WP:VAIN--MONGO 06:04, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Pop Idol which contains all the encyclopedic info we have on him. The fact he didn't make it into the show (as far as I can tell) and decided not to pursue his music career, shows me he doesn't deserve his own article, but a redirect is useful for people who want to look the guy up. - Mgm|(talk) 10:06, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep it says he was famous across england after singing eye of the tiger. One-hit wonders are notable enough to have bios here. -- Astrokey44 |talk 11:30, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, there are "rumours in the tabloids" about his person who appeared on Pop Idol with news coverage. Kappa 18:31, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * If we are going to keep articles based on "rumors in the tabloids", then Wikipedia is definitely going down the tubes.
 * Yeah I can see it would too bad if wikipedia catered to the inferior tastes of the lower classes. Kappa 23:08, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Mgm Cynical 20:12, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Mgm D e nni &#9775;  02:43, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Mgm. Stifle 12:59, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. Singing on a show does not equal a one hit wonder. At best maybe a sentence or two in the Pop Idol article but not all this content. ++Lar 15:09, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep per Astrokey44. Pepsidrinka 00:00, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete As requested by the subject of the article. It has become a magnet for vandalism and is non-notable in the context of encyclopediac knowledge. 81.64.37.91 15:39, 31 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Forgive my newbiness, but what's the next step in all this? How does it get delete/kept? Have tried looking up Wikipedia "how to..." articles but can't find anything Asw32 01:22, 3 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.