Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warriors of the Boer Nation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No prejudice to an appropriate redirect. postdlf (talk) 13:23, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Warriors of the Boer Nation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

purportedly unsubstantiated yadda yadda Wikipedia does not deal in rumors Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 05:09, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The first line "a suspected but unsubstantiated South African terrorist group" says it's a rumor. It fails WP:V. This article has existed 2005, and in those 10 years no one has provided sources to substantiate its existence. Doing a Google search brings up nothing but other sites that repeat that same sentence - suspected, but unsubstantiated. In the current state of the world, terrorist groups by name are all over the news, and on lists of state security agencies. This one would have shown up somewhere. This could be a hoax.  This could be anything, but what it cannot  be is an encyclopedic article as it currently exists. — Maile  (talk) 13:44, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:33, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 07:54, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect - to 2002 Soweto bombings, seems to lack significant coverage in reliable sources per WP:GNG so unable to sustain an article of its own. Seems a viable search term though. Anotherclown (talk) 08:57, 17 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Redirect although I would've easily said delete as well with my searches finding nothing good at all. SwisterTwister   talk  05:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of sources. It's easy to start rumors, if this one is real, sources will follow and there can be an article then.  Bur, really, basing on an article on "unauthenticated" letters?  It is a common technique to smear an enemy by sending fake letters.  WP is better than this.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:13, 21 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.