Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wars and conflicts between India and Pakistan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Deletion does not seem to be an issue here. Discuss possible move on the talkpage. Tone 20:57, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Wars and conflicts between India and Pakistan

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

baseless infos needs complete editing else as a last sort a removal ...  Doctor muthu's muthu    wanna talk ? 23:00, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


 * question Is there another India/Pakistan conflicts article that this is a POV fork of? It seems rather long lived if it is - if it isn't then I seriously have to question AfD as a method for dealing with problems on it. Artw (talk) 00:20, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep but move to "Indo-Pakistani Wars" as that seems to be more common (eg. Boer Wars). Appears to easily pass the threshold on grounds of notability. Lord Cornwallis (talk) 00:38, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * It may need some work; it may need to be renamed, but this this seems like an easy keep to me. There is no way that an article discussing the wars and conflicts between these two nations is "baseless".  On the contrary this is a notable topic. &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  04:06, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.  —Nick-D (talk) 08:22, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep but no objection to a move. I'm not sure a valid reason was given for deletion.Hobit (talk) 12:45, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep. If it needs editing, discuss with other editors, and edit. Deletion is for when there isn't any room for any likely encyclopedia article on the subject, which there clearly is. Nominating for deletion because you can't come to agreement with other editors isn't the way to go. --GRuban (talk) 19:08, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.