Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwick Castle, Maida Vale


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep (non-admin closure) 198.84.253.202 (talk) 18:52, 20 January 2018 (UTC)

Warwick Castle, Maida Vale

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

NN pub. Fails GNG. A quick search didn't find significant sources outside of tourist and pub listing websites. There's passing mentions in a few books. Widefox ; talk 14:35, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep We have had this sort of AfD many times before. The relevant policy is WP:GEOFEAT, "Artificial geographical features that are officially assigned the status of cultural heritage or national heritage, or of any other protected status on a national level and which verifiable information beyond simple statistics are available are presumed to be notable." Edwardx (talk) 14:56, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:GEOFEAT guideline has "significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability" . I didn't find any. (Grade II listed doesn't add up to much, which is the only source we have, II* or I is more like it). "Also, Many artificial geographical features may be mentioned in plenty of reliable sources, but they may not necessarily be notable" is also applicable. The G II listing is run-of-the-mill too. Is there a link for presumed notability of G II? and even then, if there's no sources and we only know it's build mid 1800 then WP:PERMASTUB and we may as well redirect to the list List of pubs in London. Widefox ; talk 15:50, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * That's all very well, but with a GII listing it is "presumed to be notable". In any event, the article has now been expanded. Edwardx (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 15:22, 20 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Historic building with lots of RS.Zigzig20s (talk) 18:49, 20 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.