Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwick Dunnett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:12, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Warwick Dunnett
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable poker player whose biggest claim to fame is to have been the editor for a compilation of poker strategies. --- Balloonman  NO! I'm Spartacus!
 * Weak delete I couldn't find much apart from some fantastic sounding PR articles. Certainly the waffle about the pilot career can be trimmed down. I'm interested to hear from the substantial editors, perhaps they have better resources that could be added to the article. Hazir (talk) 07:50, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The entire Poker players category needs a good cleaning.  Who is up to the task?  JBsupreme (talk) 08:01, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD about Warwick Dunnett. If hope your vote is based on the merits of this article. Hazir (talk) 08:18, 27 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —Grahame (talk) 00:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Notified wikiproject Poker about this AFD--- Balloonman  NO! I'm Spartacus! 01:52, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I am open to being convinced but it's all too thin at present. For example, a news archive search produces just this. Also, I don't think his tournament record is yet good enough for notability. Bridgeplayer (talk) 02:27, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Concur with nominator, not significant enough coverage in reliable third-party sources. Risker (talk) 04:13, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.