Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warwick TV


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete - again, nobody has a right to an article, you must prove merit. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Warwick TV


NN student TV station per WP:ORG. Won two self-laudatary awards from NaSTA. I refer to Articles for deletion/LUST Delete Ohconfucius 03:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC) This should stay particular since it was featured in the sunday times, or is the world leading newspaper no longer a source of notable information? (Capt Jack Doicy)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 05:58, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as well; student TV news programs, which exist at so many colleges, are rarely notable (as so very few people watch student TV). Allon Fambrizzi 08:38, 16 November 2006 (UTC)Allon Fambrizzi
 * But it wasn't the main focus of the article, which it must be to be notable. MER-C 09:35, 16 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete OMG, WTF, ETC, the whole bloody lot of 'em.SkierRMH 09:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment "Capt Jack Doicy" the only proponent in this series — Preceding unsigned comment added by SkierRMH (talk • contribs)
 * Keep Student TV Stations have a right to an entry in Wikipedia. Some are older than national broadcasters, and all of the UK ones (to my knowledge) could provide evidence that they are discussed in 'third party sources' (as per WP:ORG).  Also, I'd like to know why none of the US stations are up for deletion. JMalky
 * Keep - Form all stations into one article, but don't delete. Almost every channel available in the UK is listed, just look at Propeller TV for an example. This should extend to student and community channels too, even if it only needs one entry for both of these categories. Kind Regards -  Heligoland   |   Talk  |   Contribs  11:10, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep Again I agree with JMalky. This article clearly asserts notability scope_creep 17:26, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.