Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Warx2 (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, snow close. I'm closing this early per WP:SNOW, as the consensus here from the non-WP:SPA accounts is to delete. No notability has been established that would satisfy our notability guidelines. I have also salted the article accordingly. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   09:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Warx2
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article has been continuously recreated after being deleted via various speedy deletion criteria. In its current form, I don't see that the article meets any speedy deletion criteria, but it still should not merit inclusion. All links used in the article (added without context) are to unreliable sources, and the only "coverage" I can find online is a relentless attempt to promote the film via press releases and promotional videos. Falls very short of being notable, and I believe it's only on Wikipedia to increase visibility of the film. --  At am a  頭 20:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. --  At am a  頭  20:14, 8 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Not notable, fails WP:MOVIE... JMHamo (talk) 20:21, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence of notability based on reliable sources that are independent. Also, article is not written in neutral point of view but rather supporting the views of the film-makers.  If both issues can be addressed, might be worth keeping.  Robert McClenon (talk) 22:30, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

This film warx2 deserves to remain on Wikipedia with its own page article because 1. its features notable person Bishop Thomas Muthee. 2. it includes President Obama. 3. U.S military suicides also included 4. terrorism is also part of this film. 5. more than 3 articles about this film have been provided. guputa1111 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Guputa1111 (talk • contribs) 21:50, 8 March 2014 (UTC)  — Guputa1111 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * Delete - Not because it it isn't notable, simply because it's too soon. Hasn't been released yet and hasn't been reviewed. -- Auric    talk  22:40, 8 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete under wp:CRYSTAL. The list of reasons to include it above are meaningless.  Wait til it's out. Neonchameleon (talk) 01:06, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

DON'T DELETE WARX2 In fairness this article warx2 needs its own Wikipedia page now, its notable enough and it is one of a kind film. lets put religious and political biases aside and lets be professionals ! there are a lot of film articles that are not as notable as warx2 but have their own Wikipedia pages. notability is not an issue with warx2. -Texasebong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Texasebong (talk • contribs) 06:13, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * That's not how it works here. Please read WP:NF to see what the requirements are for retention. Thanks,  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

DON'T DELETE ;If you are worried about this film for religious or political reasons ; don't worry I think they (warx2) will want to create awareness not turn off 50+ percent plus of people for being one sided politically or religiously. They will want everybody included. NO ENOUGH REASONS FOR DELETION OF WARX2. -Kabibiharris
 * Delete per TOO SOON. Their own press release promised a Fall 2013 theatrical release, and it did not happen. If this is ever released, and if it gets the coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:NF, an undeletion or recreation might be considered.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:18, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and comments I've removed some duplicated text. Note that Texasebong and Kabibiharris are new accounts with their only contributions being to this discussion, presumably sock or meat.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:56, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.