Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Was it love?


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Was it love?

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

DePRODed solely because several editors were sqabbling over how to use the PROD and PROD2 tags. So here we are procedurally without anyone arguing over the merits of the PROD concerns. sigh. DMacks (talk) 19:44, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, DMacks, but this is an entirely inaccurate reflection of the facts. I spent quite a bit of time with this new editor yesterday, attempting to explain the deletion policy. This is an article about a book, but another editor placed a BLP prod. (The actual article about the author may be found at Arpan Sharma) I removed the BLP prod and contacted the new editor to explain my action. At that point, the other editor complained on my talk page, then revised the rationale that I offered in the PROD, stating that the article was a BLP. I removed the added statement and contacted the other editor with guidance on placing a PROD2. In essence, the other editor failed to follow deletion policy in regards to this article. Rather than continue speaking to a brick wall, I removed the PROD, due to the diluted process in following policy. I would rather not have a PROD that I added revised to state an invalid reasoning for deletion. Process was followed here. Your misrepresentation of the facts though is rather puzzling and questionable. Best regards, Cindy  ( talk to me ) 20:27, 17 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Completely unsourced article. A search for sources turns up nothing but this page and one Wikipedia mirror. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 20:15, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per Metropolitan90. Leadup to AfD nom seems to have been less than optimal; however, process appears to have been followed.   dci  &#124;  TALK   23:11, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom of DMacks. Sorry about squabble! Star767 (talk) 00:14, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - No reliable sources can be established to verify its notability. Eduemoni↑talk↓  13:48, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:31, 20 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:32, 20 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete; no reliable sources to speak of (Google search term "was it love" "arpan sharma"). CtP  (t • c) 23:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.