Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington Boulevard Apartments


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 16:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Washington Boulevard Apartments


Tagged for speedy deletion as a directory entry, but that's not a speedy criterion. It is, however, a perfectly valid criticism of this article. It makes no attempt to establish the significance of the subject beyond mere existence. Guy (Help!) 16:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete article contains absolutely nothing to suggest that this building is in any way remarkable. Demiurge 16:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - Somebody might wanna take a look at the template at the bottom and see if any others need to go? (there is a speedy for no assertion of notability (A7) but i am ok with leaving this up to the AFD.) Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 16:37, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - there's no assertion of notability, and in doing a google search, cannot find any historic signifigance attached to it. About the only thing turned up was it showing as 47th on a list of th 100 tallest buildings of Detroit. -- Whpq 16:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom Simonkoldyk 21:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - nothing that asserts this building's notability in the article. --SunStar Net 21:31, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, and I'd take a closer look at all the template members in the "under 25 stories" category, per Chrislk02. I'm a big architecture fan but Wikipedia is not a collection of lists of buildings like Emporis. --Dhartung | Talk 22:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep (actually Merge to Detroit, Michigan per WP:LOCAL might be better), meets content policies. A height of 23 storeys was probably quite significant in 1922 anyway.  JYolkowski // talk 22:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Merge to Detroit, Michigan or, possibly and article for tall buildings in Detroit, as advised by WP:LOCAL. Otherwise, the information in meets Wikipedia's content policies, in that it is verifiable, cites as a reliable source, and appears NPOV.  Thus, although it is quite silly to have separate articles for each building, nothing about this article is particulary offensive to any core policy.  Therefore, I suggest a centralized article for such buildings in Detroit.-- danntm T C 18:22, 2 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.