Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Washington Military Department Organizational Norms


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 11:47, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Washington Military Department Organizational Norms

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

A complete unreferenced, unencyclopedic article about an unnotable subject. prod removed by author so it must mean something to someone. . . Mean as custard (talk) 12:14, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.
 * Delete - not notable, no GHits of any kind, no references, no indication that it is significant in any way. (GregJackP (talk) 17:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC))
 * Delete non notable organisational policy. Buckshot06 (talk) 03:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete non notable, not written in an encyclopedic style. RadManCF (talk) 04:00, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete entirely non-notable bureaucratic values statement. Nick-D (talk) 09:47, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unencyclopedic. — AustralianRupert (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. There isn't an article here, to be honest. It's obvious that this is close to a verbatim copy of something, and there are other sites for posting such information. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 14:11, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.