Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waste Elimination Accidents


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 05:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Waste Elimination Accidents

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Made up in school one nasty day, posted to Wikipedia the next. Google only returns Wikipedia mirrors. Don't know why it's plural. SolidPlaid 07:24, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT. I thought this article would be about nuclear waste. How very naive of me. --Bongwarrior 07:30, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * delete lol. A funny piece of writing but unfortunately does not meet our criteria. -- Hdt 83     Chat 08:05, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * delete The term seems to be a neologism. The subject matter is covered extensively from a medical point of view in urinary incontinence and fecal incontinence User:Dimadick —Preceding signed but undated comment was added at 12:28, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above... Chances that you will have such an accident increase during the time that it takes to access and read the article. And since Wikipedia is not a "paper" encylopedia, cleanup cannot be had merely by tearing pages.  Mandsford 16:19, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Eliminate this waste from wikipedia. THE KING 20:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.