Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WatchTime


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:50, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

WatchTime

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Little to no notability; one self-citation and another to homepage of a Flash site. Fails WP:GNG. Brianhe (talk) 10:37, 10 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete Their "advertise with us" web page claims that they have 600K "readers" and 75K subscribers. They also list a number of awards, such as the Folio FAME award ("Best Expo • WatchTime Magazine – Inside Basel & Geneva. http://www.foliomag.com/2014/2014-fame-awards-winner-announced/] and an Eddy award from the same organization for "Consumer Interest/Hobbyist" magazine.  No idea how important these are. However, held in only 7 US/Canada libraries. I don't find any sources. Although it gives bona fides for the publisher, I don't find much about it either. The publisher's web site is so bad G-translate can't translate it. In any case, unless we can find that this is THE key watch magazine in the US, I can't see keeping the article. LaMona (talk) 23:57, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   It will rain    08:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Human 3015   It will rain    08:14, 17 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Can't find any independent sources. Fails WP:NMAG. Dat GuyTalkContribs 10:34, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of this currently convinces any better for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:55, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete, does not meet WP:GNG, a gsearch brings up variations of magazine webpage, blogs, and other non-useable sites.Coolabahapple (talk) 07:17, 22 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.