Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watchman Fellowship


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (non-admin closure) &mdash; kikichugirl  speak up! 05:34, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Watchman Fellowship

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable ministry, fails WP:ORG. Tgeairn (talk) 06:10, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Skr15081997 (talk) 16:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 22:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Comment - If no activity occurs for another seven days, can we just consider this a WP:PROD and delete? Thanks, Tgeairn (talk) 20:51, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Weak keep There are not many organisations operating in this field. This does not appear to be a one-man-band (for which I would certainly vote to delete).  However I know nothing of it and do not feel able to give a stronger vote.  Peterkingiron (talk) 21:20, 8 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 03:21, 10 February 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Selective merge to Christian countercult movement. Very selective. I just added the cite from the St. Petersburg Times to its entry in the list of organizations at Christian countercult movement, and that seems like all that is worth merging. There were a few brief mentions in books, brief mentions in rather obscure sources in News, and a fair number of mentions on Google, but nothing that looked like an RS. Mostly blogs and fundamentalist Christian sites. – Margin1522 (talk) 10:32, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 05:39, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.