Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water District (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:32, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Water District (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a band, shading into advertorial territory (not blatant enough to be a speedy, but skewing away from WP:NPOV nonetheless) about a band with no strong claim of notability under WP:NMUSIC. And the sourcing here is entirely to blogs and primary sources with not so much as one single solitary piece of reliable source coverage shown. As usual, a band is not automatically entitled to have a Wikipedia article just because they exist; RS coverage supporting a proper claim of notability must be present before they qualify. Delete. Bearcat (talk) 06:51, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 13:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as searches found nothing better and the current article is still questionable for the notability. SwisterTwister   talk  07:35, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:23, 3 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.