Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water Resources Archive at Colorado State University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:04, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Water Resources Archive at Colorado State University

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of WP:GNG or WP:ORG: lacking significant coverage from independent, third-party sources. The subject is basically a thematic collection of materials in a university library: every library has them, and they are routinely used for research: Nothing inherently notable here. --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:14, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete I thought maybe it could be inserted and the article redirected to here but notability is lacking.--NortyNort (Holla) 22:09, 9 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:41, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:42, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KTC (talk) 00:26, 17 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 02:59, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with the nominator, notability isn't established here and the subject lacks independent coverage. --Michig (talk) 08:34, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No independent coverage, no independent notability, does not remotely pass WP:GNG. Softlavender (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.