Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water fluoridation chemical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy redirect to Water fluoridation. NJA (t/ c)  11:38, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Water fluoridation chemical
The Water Fluoridation Chemical page is only a description and definition of the water fluoridation chemical itself. The description and definition of the water fluoridation chemical will come from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Union's National Headquarters documents as well as a few others.

A page on Wikipedia that only defines and describes what the water fluoridation chemical is a good thing. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hereherer (talk • contribs) 23:10, 4 January 2010 (UTC)


 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non encyclopedic POV rant against water flouridation Wuh  Wuz  Dat  19:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as completely hopeless. I speedy tagged a bit earlier because I had no idea what it was supposed to be about, but figured that whatever it was must be a needless duplication of Water fluoridation.  Whatever the case, this is utterly unencyclopedic.   Glenfarclas   ( talk ) 19:51, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as unnecessary and PoV. (I must stress that personally I am against compulsory fluoridation but not on these rather suspect grounds.) Peridon (talk) 19:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - no need for discussion. The exact opposite of an encyclopedia article. Doomsdayer520  (Talk|Contribs) 20:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Either Speedy Delete or redirect to Water fluoridation. Pepper ·piggle 21:39, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I removed the speedy A10 tag, which is not supposed to be used for POV or content forks, & I read this as a POV fork. But the article is indeed hopeless   DGG ( talk ) 21:55, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as a hopelessly POV platform promoting a WP:FRINGE view. Eubulides (talk) 00:48, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Retain for now and let the author develop it. It may have potential.  If result is insufficient content, for it's own article, Merge into Water fluoridation.  --  Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 00:53, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Changing to Delete – The article Opposition to water fluoridation already covers the general issues. I see nothing of value here.  Appears to be some odd form of WP:SYNTHESIS.  --  Tom N (tcncv) talk/contrib 06:35, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - We all realize that many respectable articles are nucleated from unpromising starts, but Wikipedia is host to many articles on this general area, e.g. water fluoridation (recent Featured Article), opposition to water fluoridation, fluoride poisoning, fluorosis, not to mention the many chemical species used for fluoridation (e.g. sodium fluoride, fluoride, hexafluorosilicic acid, and more). Furthermore the article appears conceived to advance a soapboxing agenda.--Smokefoot (talk) 01:47, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.