Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water in Our World


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Water in Our World
The result was Delete (I feel like a heartless bastard). Tim Vickers (talk) 17:57, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

WP:OR. Despite the endearing plea... this is original research (and says so itself). Cricketgirl (talk) 09:36, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:OR.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 09:44, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - Per WP:OR.  a s e nine say what?  12:39, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. A school project by 5 kids, mostly OR. Nsk92 (talk) 16:57, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, self-admitted original research. J I P  | Talk 17:06, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete The content could actually be clean-up-abble, but the editors don't seem interested in conforming to WP's policies, so out it goes. Townlake (talk) 20:18, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Effectively no sources, probable-copyvio images (there's no way they drew that pie chart themselves), questionable information ("There are about 1.460 Pt of water in our world"). Oh, and the same information already exists at more sensible titles, like water. Zetawoof(&zeta;) 22:28, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.