Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water sustainability at UBC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to University of British Columbia. North America1000 18:40, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Water sustainability at UBC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability ElKevbo (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge into University of British Columbia. The target section focuses almost entirely on a single building in the campus, and could use some rebalancing. Topic is not notable enough to merit its own article. —  Newslinger  talk   21:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:47, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:47, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. —  Newslinger   talk   20:58, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Early v.rough consensus over lacking notability, but discussion should be had over delete/merge/redirect

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 11:01, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge into University of British Columbia. Source text can delete some of the explanatory material if it is in a larger article, and target could be improved with additional info. This article's sole focus on water sustainability at UBC is too narrow to support with proper sourcing. Bakazaka (talk) 16:53, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. Not enough sourcing and unlikely to have enough based on the topic. The article only mentions a couple buildings in any case. What about the rest of them? An article on this topic would need more information than what it currently has to merit and stand-alone article. Tillerh11 (talk) 17:35, 4 August 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.