Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Water well


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Speedy keep after copyvio removal. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:54, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Water well

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Possible copyvio, see. Maybe should be just rewritten, but bringing here for consensus.  jj137  ♠ 22:39, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy Keep & RM CV Def. no grounds to delete, you might as well delete pillow or spanner. -- Librarianofages (talk) 22:42, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep and remove copyright violation, as directed at Copyright problems. If you want to discuss copyright violations, that page is probably the place to do it. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:46, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - I've removed the copyvioed content, which was added nearly a year ago. I should note that Jj137 didn't realize that I intended to take care of the problem; I meant my AfD advice as a more broad suggestion. Sorry if that wasn't clear, Jj - my fault. Tijuana Brass (talk) 22:48, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Note - I suggest someone close this AfD as speedy keep (I'd rather not, as I started it) --  jj137  ♠ 22:53, 7 January 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.