Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterboarding in the 21st century


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. (NAC) -- J mundo 15:34, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Waterboarding in the 21st century

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Unless I'm mistaken, this is an exact duplicate of Waterboarding, with a few section cut out. I don't see the point: either cut them out of waterboarding (or drastically shorten them), or keep a single article. Since waterboarding isn't (yet) overly long, and since this seems an unlikely redirect target, we may as well delete. Biruitorul Talk 23:53, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I started this page, it was stuff that was agreed to be split from waterboarding, then one editor re-added to waterboarding what was cut from it. Seeing as the article is under arb com probation, 1rr and stuff i've not edit warred and now trying to delete the stuff one section at a time. I've also provided sources for stuff that could be added to this article that is not in Waterboarding at the moment, but as most editors in this area prefer to troll rather than work its been slow going. ( Hypnosadist )  00:05, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Trimmed some more from waterboarding (as much as i can without the cries of censorship ringing out hopefully). ( Hypnosadist )  00:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

21st century stuff needs to be moved from waterboarding to this article. there have been some objections, mainly from Badagnani, that have slowed down the process. —Chris Capoccia T&#8260;C 05:34, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Should I withdraw this until the conflict gets worked out? I'd be glad to - only the key point is the duplicated content should go. - Biruitorul Talk 15:02, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * That would be great, if you could give us a month or so that would help. ( Hypnosadist )  15:15, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * OK. To be honest I hadn't read the talk page discussions before making the nomination, but that's fine - I now withdraw this debate and you are free to close it. - Biruitorul Talk 15:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.