Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterloo Central Railway


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 00:10, 26 April 2009 (UTC)

Waterloo Central Railway

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Only non-trivial source I found is a brief snippet in a 2007 Globe and Mail. Doesn't confer enough notability to overcome the high COI (author is ). Blueboy96 01:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect (and merge if appropriate) to Waterloo-St._Jacobs_Railway; inadequately notable on its own. JJL (talk) 02:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Why? What a nice article. The Wurdalak (talk) 02:15, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. Stub article with potential for growth Wuhwuzdat (talk) 22:06, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep -, and are bout this railway.  At the very least, it's a merge as noted above.  Ther's no good reason for deletion. -- Whpq (talk) 16:02, 21 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.