Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterloo Co-operative Residence Incorporated


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 21:06, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Waterloo Co-operative Residence Incorporated

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article about a housing cooperative which is referenced only to a single primary source, and has been flagged as such since 2009 without ever having a single reliable source added to assist in making it notable. As always, every organization does not get an automatic inclusion freebie just because it exists -- it needs to be the subject of media coverage, not just technically verifiable on the website of a larger association it's a member of, for a Wikipedia article to become earned. Bearcat (talk) 18:10, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 18:11, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:07, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as not meeting WP:ORGCRIT, full of primary sources from the co-op associations. It could be retargeted to a listing in the Ontario Co-operative Association but caution must be given that it is WP:NOTDIRECTORY AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 16:30, 27 June 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 01:31, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No indicia of encyclopedic notability. bd2412  T 19:41, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - a Google search doesn't turn up any media coverage. The current single source is a dead link. Fails WP:GNG. TimTempleton (talk) (cont)  20:01, 9 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.