Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Watermaze

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was copyvio -- AllyUnion (talk) 14:18, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Watermaze
Either original research or a copy vioGeni 11:11, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment: Copyvio of . Kappa 12:41, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I have tagged the page and listed it on Copyright problems. --Plek 13:33, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * I believe that this was posted by the copyright holder. Perhaps he will confirm. Needs wikifying though. --Daedelus 13:27, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * In that case, I think it would be advertising.Kappa 19:16, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.