Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterstreet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat  04:00, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Waterstreet


Non-notable band of local scope. Substantially all original research. --Closeapple 08:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete (inserting my vote at the top so it doesn't look like I'm double-voting):
 * Non-notable: They don't seem to have been notable enough for WP:BAND in the first place.   Doesn't seem to be a band that will meet Wikipedia notability standards any time in the near future.  Article implies they don't play regularly together anymore; their official website seems to be down.
 * Original research: Mostly well-written prose, but seems to not have any sources at all; definately looks like a first-hand experience rather than having other verifiable sources (see WP:NOR).
 * --Closeapple 08:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:BAND, advertising, original research, WP:COI. --Ter e nce Ong (C 08:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above, borderline speedy. MER-C 08:58, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the band were notable, the OR/fancruft could be deleted, leaving a stub, but AMG lists them as having one self-published album, which fall far short of meeting WP:MUSIC.  Xtifr tälk 13:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete —  Doesn't seem notable, nothing links there either. –-  kungming·  2 | (Talk ·Contact) 22:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: User:72.49.254.158 had vandalized my comments above to make it look like I supported keeping this article. My vote is DELETE.  This user has also re-added members of this band to another page and edited parts of a user's comment out on another AfD vote.  See Special:Contributions/72.49.254.158 - possible sock puppetry? --Closeapple 09:33, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.