Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waterworks Mall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. W.marsh 04:00, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Waterworks Mall

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't see the significance of this mall. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HoustonWeHaveAProblem (talk • contribs) 14:23, 1 July 2007


 * Delete - article fails to cite sources and assert notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by HoustonWeHaveAProblem (talk • contribs)
 * Keep. I added several references to this article. I would say that it's definitely notable, given the kidnapping incident. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 16:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Malls are generally notable, nominating users only contribs are nominating Pittsburgh malls for deletion. Anyone smell socks?-- trey  20:24, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That would be me -- I guess I forgot to change my socks again... Er, seriously though, I think that this user's nomination was truly in good faith, as the article made no assertion of notability at the time. Ten Pound Hammer  • (((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps))) 23:38, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I think the baby raping or whatever makes it notable, also, it is notable in the Pittsburgh Metro and beyond. (I live in Erie, PA and have herd of it.-- trey  23:49, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

— HoustonWeHaveAProblem (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.| -- trey  02:47, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak delete One crime in a mall, however awful, does not make the mall notable. There's nothi ng else that even asserts any notability.DGG 00:50, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 07:35, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 07:36, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep see above ¿SFGi Д nts!  ¿Complain! ¿Analyze! ¿Review! 17:05, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.