Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wattle Hollow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:22, 14 October 2014 (UTC)

Wattle Hollow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A google search finds lots of travel reviews but nothing to indicate why this retreat is notable Gbawden (talk) 10:59, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  11:39, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 15:13, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Buddhism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:32, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete-The article really does not explain what this even is either. Wgolf (talk) 04:03, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 00:27, 7 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete or even speedy delete. This article doesn't even make a claim of notability, and I found nothing to help its cause. --Larry (talk) 01:31, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 (talk) 06:37, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable no RS 1-line resort spam stub. Cramyourspam (talk) 21:00, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.