Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waukeen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Forgotten Realms deities. (non-admin closure) &mdash; Music1201  talk  21:57, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Waukeen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This character currently lacks any independent sources to establish notability. TTN (talk) 18:10, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 18:26, 28 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep or merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities. BOZ (talk) 21:40, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Forgotten Realms deities, as not notable enough for a page. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 21:44, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge and Redirect as above; viable search term.Vulcan&#39;s Forge (talk) 22:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect specifically to List of Forgotten Realms deities. I would say merge, but that list has the same essential details already, although it could be rewritten to match what's in the lead of this article. —Torchiest talkedits 23:11, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and speedy close. As usual, no legitimate argument advanced for deletion by a nominator who does not comply with WP:BEFORE and uses AFD nominations to advance his viewpoint in a long-running dispute over the form subjects should be covered, which is not a legitimate, good faith use of the deletion process. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006.  (talk) 18:50, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Strong merge, no reliable sources from what I can tell. WP:NOTINHERITED, Waukeen needs to demonstrate notability independent of the D&D franchise.  Satellizer el Bridget (Talk)  06:55, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. Josh Milburn (talk) 09:22, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect obviously, not convincing for its own article but also not convincing to delete altogether. SwisterTwister   talk  07:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.