Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wave Radio (internet)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  03:18, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Wave Radio (internet)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Completely unsourced article about a shortlived internet radio station. Note that internet radio streams do not get an automatic presumption of notability per WP:NMEDIA just because they (purportedly) existed -- to be notable enough for a Wikipedia article, it would have to show a WP:GNG-worthy volume of reliable source coverage about it in media independent of itself, in order to establish its enduring significance -- but this has been tagged for lacking sources since 2010, without ever having any new sources added to bolster its notability. As I don't have access to any database in which I could forage for archived US media coverage about something that went belly-up 17 years ago, I'm willing to withdraw this if somebody can actually find more solid sourcing to salvage this with -- but nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt it from having to pass GNG on the referencing. Bearcat (talk) 03:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 03:13, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 03:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Subject fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage was found from searching Google or NewsBank or Proquest's databases.--Tdl1060 (talk) 08:49, 24 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.