Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wave plan of Geneva


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep.  howch e  ng   {chat} 21:06, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

Wave plan of Geneva
Rather poorly written article, which I take to be a case of first impression. Are "wave plans" (radio transmission regulations, apparently) of individual Swiss cities notable? Xoloz 16:28, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and mark for cleanup. It's a bad translation of de:Genfer Wellenplan. Europe 1, a badly-translated article on a French radio station, mentions it. It appears to be an international agreement to avoid interference between radio stations on the same wavelength. I believe is the same thing - it's called the "Regional Agreement concerning the Use by the Broadcasting Service of Frequencies in the Medium Frequency Bands in Regions 1 and 3 in the Low Frequency Bands in Region 1" there. Hopefully someone who knows more about European and Asian radio can help. --SPUI (talk | don't use sorted stub templates! ) 00:59, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Aha - this appears to be the agreement. I'm not sure if there's a better name than Regional Agreement Concerning the Use by the Broadcasting Service of Frequencies in the Medium Frequency Bands in Regions 1 and 3 and in the Low Frequency Bands in Region 1. appears to confirm its "notability":
 * I011. Which “Regional” plans, established under the auspices of the ITU, are still relevant to the terrestrial services?
 * Frequency assignment plans for LF and MF broadcasting annexed to the Regional Agreement on LF/MF Broadcasting (Regions 1 and 3), Geneva, 1975 (GE75);
 * It also seems to be referred to as Frequency assignment plan GE75 and Regional agreement GE75. --SPUI (talk | don't use sorted stub templates! ) 01:05, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete or move into single article (preferably giving more info on the term itself). Getting "Wave plan of every-city-on-planet" here looks scaring. Pavel Vozenilek 08:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * You apparently didn't read my comments above - this is an international agreement, not a plan for a single city. --SPUI (talk | don't use sorted stub templates! ) 17:50, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and cleanup. Pilatus 21:38, 26 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.