Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waveform necklace (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted by User:RHaworth under criterion G11. (non-admin closure) • Gene93k (talk) 16:46, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

Waveform necklace
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

There seems to be very few independent reliable sources about the necklaces (or its concept), and those few I could find are little more than mentions that they exist. I think this hovers just below the notability standards; it might make a good article in a couple of years if they catch on, but not yet. &mdash; Coren (talk) 18:24, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete and salt. At this point in time there isn't enough to show that this is particularly worthy of an article. This is the second time someone has created the article with the intent to promote Bizer's work specifically, so I highly recommend salting this to prevent further recreation until it can be proven that it passes notability guidelines.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   06:56, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.