Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waveland (Danville, Kentucky)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Waveland (Danville, Kentucky)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

estate article, with little or no assertion of notability Wuh  Wuz  Dat  02:09, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Though the article didn't indicate it before, this property is listed on the National Register of Historic Places, a designation which indicates the estate is notable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 17:14, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The NRHP listing does indicate notability. Also it has received significant coverage at least one non-NRHP 3rd party source. --Oakshade (talk) 19:35, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kentucky-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:32, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep It is notable and rather well-known as a tourist attraction in central Kentucky, as the link added later demonstrates. It's usually a good idea to work on an article in userspace first and then to post it, rather than posting and then working on it.  Put on the bandaid first, wade into the shark-infested waters second, not the other way around.  Mandsford 15:27, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable. And I like Mandsford's advice, :-P. --SulmuesLet's talk 19:35, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.