Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Waverly Central High School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. WP:SNOW, per precedent for schools. (non-admin closure) — Theo polisme  23:46, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Waverly Central High School

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Little information is contained in the article. I feel that the article contains little to no relevant information and, therefore, request the article to be considered for deletion. If I my request is unreasonable/unsubstantiated, please notify me. MisterCrazy8 (talk) 00:59, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is for a high school. Articles on high schools are typically kept per Notability (high schools).  Blue Rasberry    (talk)   02:53, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - No valid grounds for deletion presented; lack of information is an editing problem, not a notability problem. No indication that any sort of WP:BEFORE search was followed. Longstanding consensus is to keep articles about secondary schools, a consensus which I actively support. I'm just going to copy-paste this since the nominator seems to have put in about that much work making a huge series of equally dubious nominations. Carrite (talk) 04:35, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep per longstanding consensus that secondary schools are notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:28, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep Such schools are considered notable. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 21:39, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep - no policy-compliant grounds for deletion specified. No reason why it can't meet WP:N. TerriersFan (talk) 00:03, 25 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.