Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wavy the Creator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  Sandstein  15:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Wavy the Creator

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fail to see how this musician is notable, almost all the sources are mainly about his album promotions. the topic of this article fails WP:NMUSICIAN, it fails wikipedia notability guildlines, another upcoming musician without any relevant to speak about , completely and utterly non-notable musician, sourced entirely to press releases , No evidence of notability Samat lib (talk) 08:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.Samat lib (talk) 09:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions Samat lib (talk) 09:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Samat lib (talk) 09:09, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 October 25.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 09:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep having lengthy profiles in multiple magazines, including Vogue is enough to meet WP:SIGCOV. Very little seems to be sourced to press releases, and only where appropriate. --Paul &#10092;talk&#10093; 10:51, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - >her by the way. Foxnpichu (talk) 10:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * comment the article on including Vogue fail to satisfy WP:NMUSICIAN,  and WP:GNG . orther related sources provided on the artcle are press releases , Notability not found  on those article , Samat lib (talk) 19:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * In what way does it fail? Literally the first point in "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." Vogue and Guardian.ng obviously cover that. --Paul &#10092;talk&#10093; 08:42, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * comment  Insufficient coverage in only 2 sources  ., including Vogue   fail to satisfy WP:NMUSICIAN, WP:GNG, No evidence of notability Samat lib (talk) 19:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * It's a much greater range of coverage than the artist articles you've created (1, 2), the notability is clearly apparent. What on earth is your motivation with these nominations? --Paul &#10092;talk&#10093; 20:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * comment wikipedoa is not a place for irelevant topic,  article that fail to satisfy WP:NMUSICIAN ,  and WP:GNG , upcoming musician without any relevant to speak about , Samat lib (talk) 21:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep — I can observe at least three reliable sources discussing subject. Per WP:MUSICBIO, Failure to meet any criterion listed therein doesn’t translate to the subject of the article being non notable, with 3 good sources in the article I’d say GNG is satisfied here. Furthermore @, in the nominator's defense, I For one who has lived in Nigeria for 20+ years can say for a fact that any Nigerian editor passing by without thoroughly vetting the article's sources would !vote a Delete in a heartbeat as subject of our discussion has almost no recognition in the Nigerian media/ Nigerian entertainment industry. I believe a COI is present in the article also. Celestina007 (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep as has significant coverage in multiple reliable sources so passes WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 23:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.