Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Way of the Dragon 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. WP:NORUSH -- We can afford to take our time to improve articles, to wait before deleting a new article unless its potential significance cannot be established. (non-admin closure) — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   03:17, 23 August 2015 (UTC)

Way of the Dragon 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )
 * USA release:

Few reliable external references, looks like a generic Bruceploitation film with no particularly notable qualities. Westroopnerd (talk) 19:24, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * May I have some more time to expand the page? 19jduryea
 * If deleted, would you like it placed as a WP:DRAFT at User:19jduryea/workspace/Way of the Dragon 2 for you to work on until it is better cited to more clearly meet WP:NF? (hint: Check non-English sources)  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 06:56, 21 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Reasoning may be correct but an AfD 4 minutes after creation is a bit quick.Peter Rehse (talk) 20:39, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. North America1000 21:00, 16 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Weak keep. I'll echo the problems with the nomination timing, especially as regards a pre-Internet era Hong Kong-produced film. Google reveals capsule reviews in several books. The international release schedule is ... interesting, and suggests the possibility of period Chinese or German material or more recent Dutch sources. I'm not saying this is ironclad at passing the notability standards, but there's reason to believe that WP:BEFORE could not have been adequately fulfilled in the 4 minutes that passed between article creation and nomination (and in the face of active editing during that time). Squeamish Ossifrage (talk) 17:01, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * alts
 * Worldwide English:
 * Mandarin:
 * Spain::
 * French:
 * Greece 1::
 * Greece re-issue::
 * Cantonese::
 * Italy::
 * West Germany::


 * Keep per a little WP:BEFORE shows this film as having multiple international releases and enough coverage in multiple languages to meet WP:NF, and being a Bruceploitation is not an automatic non-notability. Instead we look for sourcing, and finding we keep. While the article might be tagged for improvement, deletion of an improvable topic does not serve the project nor its readers. And I do agree with as sending this to deletion just four minutes after it was authored and while it was being actively edited seems just a bit hurried.   Schmidt,  Michael Q. 09:50, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.