Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayanad Muslim Orphanage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. See WP:NPASR. Kurykh (talk) 07:39, 28 February 2017 (UTC)

Wayanad Muslim Orphanage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

For a nearly 50 year old organization this is surprisingly failing WP:GNG miserably. I could not locate any references in WP:RS. Fails WP:NORG as well. And creator's olny contributions have been to edit this page; possible WP:COI trying to WP:PROMOTE. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 15:03, 5 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - I found repeated coverage in the Hindu including coverage of the 40th anniversary in google news and pro quest. WP:NORG suggests that a (local or national) organization with in depth national (or global) coverage is notable. Also, coverage seems to meet those suggested by GNG. Smmurphy(Talk) 02:17, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * I don't think WP:SIGCOV is still met with the references you have added to the article. For example, the tehelka reference mentions WMO in just one line on how they also exhibit malpractices in gaining funds; which btw is skipped in the article and is used just to source the "motto"!! One hindu ref doesn't have weblink. The Handbook of Universities, Volume 1 ref mentions that a certain college exists but in no remotest sense even mentions it is run by this WMO. The 53 weddings ref is just trivial. And TwoCircles.net is pro-Islamic source and can not be used to establish notability. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Good point regarding the donation fraud issue. I added a section about that, and made a few more edits. I'm not sure what you mean in regards to your criticisms of the other sources. Smmurphy(Talk) 17:26, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:42, 12 February 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete-Per nom. Winged Blades Godric 04:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 02:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.