Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne County Courthouse (Indiana)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy procedural close per the consensus here. There are no delete !votes, and the nomination has absolutely no text qualifying this article's deletion. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 01:45, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Wayne County Courthouse (Indiana)

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Opaqueambiguity (talk) 01:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indiana-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:17, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Procedural close. No reason given for deletion. Article looks fine. Pburka (talk) 01:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. From this AfD's edit history, the nominator's rationale appears to be "not notable". The courthouse is listed on National Register of Historic Places. That means to documents to expand this article are out there to be retrieved. • Gene93k (talk) 01:26, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * What AfD edit history is that? There is only the initial edit that created the page.  Unscintillating (talk) 03:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The edit summary for the initial edit says "Created page with ' ~'" • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Ohhhhh... Thanks for the reply.  Unscintillating (talk) 17:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Procedural close Possibly a test edit?  The creators of this article have not been notified.  Also, please review the contribution history of this nominator.  The edit to Kix seems to be a constructive edit, but is the only one in three years.  Unscintillating (talk) 03:18, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Procedural close/keep - No deletion rationale given. NRHP is a strong indicator of notability. --Oakshade (talk) 05:37, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm curious - while the article shouldn't have been nominated for deletion without a rationale, does mention on the NRHP automatically grant notability? I'm not arguing either way; I'd be interested in what the precedents are here. Nwlaw63 (talk) 16:12, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The NRHP has much higher inclusion standards than Wikipedia. Just by its structure, the NRHP listings have a great amount of government research and reports (ie, "sources") which in itself demonstrates passing WP notability guidelines.--Oakshade (talk) 16:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Even if a rationale for deletion had been included, inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places means a clear keep. -- Necrothesp (talk) 21:56, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.