Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Dai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:07, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Wayne Dai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable businessperson who fails WP:BIO and possibly WP:GNG. The article suffers from a lack of sourcing, searches for information on the subject provide limited results, and no encyclopedia value is established. SamHolt6 (talk) 05:49, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: The article text appears to be a copy-paste from this page. AllyD (talk) 08:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:17, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article by a WP:SPA with a probable WP:COI. The article text / main ref is from a connected company so is primary. That the subject was among ten finalists in an EY Entrepreneur of the Year China in 2007 is verifiable but not I think indicative of encyclopaedic notability in itself. Nor is a photo at a social event for contributors to a fund for students at his place of education. My view is that the subject fails WP:ANYBIO. I do note that he co-authored various IEEE papers: happy to revisit if others evaluate these as sufficient for WP:ACADEMIC notability. AllyD (talk) 09:39, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.