Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Holm


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:50, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Wayne Holm

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Wikipedia is not a soapbox and not a memorial. No reliable sources to establish notability of an individual for Mr. Holm; only one news article has been found], and no sources were given with the article. tedder (talk) 17:22, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- tedder (talk) 17:40, 11 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Comment: I've had trouble finding information, but much of that is probably due to the guy dying long before the advent of the Internet.  Here is one more online article I found:    —EncMstr (talk) 19:09, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Um, that looks like the same article. Katr67 (talk) 19:16, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Quite right. I meant this one, which also looks similar, but was later in time.  —EncMstr (talk) 00:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - In addition to the material found above, I also found this news article. What this shows me is that we have a news article with very little about Holm aside from his involvement with the murder of Michael Francke.  The material in this article is highly speculative with no sourcing.  The Francke article has the same problems.  As such, there is nothing worth merging.  As an alternative, I could support a redirect to Michael Francke. -- Whpq (talk) 21:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Michael Francke until such time it is proven Holm is notable on his own. Acknowledging the possible FUTON bias, he currently doesn't appear to have any notability except for his association with the Francke case. Because there isn't proof his death is related to the case, his only connection is as a consultant to the Gable defense team and he does not appear to have had a major role in that capacity. There also doesn't appear to be anything to merge--the article is mostly a rehashing to the Francke case and speculation. Katr67 (talk) 22:53, 16 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - might be fodder for a new Ann Rule book, but has no place here. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  00:57, 19 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.