Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wayne Visser


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 20:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Wayne Visser

 * – ( View AfD View log )

non notable, advertising Stumbled on this at random, no axe to grind. But looks like an advert promoting The Age of Responsibility: CSR 2.0 and the New DNA of Business, to be consistent put an AfD on that too Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/The_Age_of_Responsibility:_CSR_2.0_and_the_New_DNA_of_Business In ictu oculi Don't actually like doing AfDs. But mm this seems to be non notable. (talk) 05:44, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Support proposed deletion for the reasons given. Also no axe to grind -- just happened on this. ServiceAT (talk) 22:42, 27 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:21, 28 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete. GS h-index of 9 does not meet WP:Prof. Solid puffery is a put-off. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:31, 28 August 2011 (UTC).
 * for someone whose notability is in writing practically oriented books, not scholarly articles, h index by itself  is usually pretty useless as an exclusion rationale. I don't think anyone would say he meets WP:PROF; the question is whether he meets WP:AUTHOR.  DGG ( talk ) 01:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Incinerate - Spam --User:DiscipleOfKnowledge (talk) 02:57, 28 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.