Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We're No Dam Experts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus that there are insuffiicent reliable/secondary sources to show notability Nosebagbear (talk) 14:22, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

We're No Dam Experts

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No reliable sources found. Fails WP:WEBCRIT and WP:GNG. Lord Grandwell (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Lord Grandwell (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Lord Grandwell (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lord Grandwell (talk) 23:41, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete, most of the references are primary. My google search did not turnup anything significant. Does not seem to pass WP:WEBCRIT nor WP:GNG. Jeepday (talk) 17:08, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee (talk) 07:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - I'd love to go exploring with them but, sadly, the subject doesn't pass GNG. No significant coverage outside primary sources when doing a BEFORE. -- A Rose Wolf ( Talk ) 18:43, 6 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.