Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We-Sport


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 09:32, 6 February 2016 (UTC)

We-Sport

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article seems to be WP:PROMO of a very small company. Main contributor appears to be the creator of the company, Marco Ivaldi. Creator of the page also appears to be an SPA, likely another one of the company founders. Lots of references on the page but they all seem to be trivial or non-reliable. FuriouslySerene (talk) 19:04, 22 January 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete It was hard to figure this out because the prose is so poor. I did some work on it just trying to make sense of the article. There are newspaper articles about the network as a startup, but if you go the company's site their list of upcoming events is empty, and they haven't tweeted about events since late October 2015. I also couldn't find any recent articles about it in the local newspaper (Turin, Italy) and it definitely seems that is the only place with activities. So it's local only, wanting to be world-wide, but apparently not even making it locally. LaMona (talk) 22:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  17:22, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 21:27, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 21:28, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 21:29, 29 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Plus, article contains no English-language citations. sixty nine   • speak up •  05:10, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as none of this better satisfies the applicable notability, there is some coverage but questionably enough. SwisterTwister   talk  03:13, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.