Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WeDo Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 12:46, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

WeDo Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Blatantly promotional and mostly unsourced. Fails CORPDEPTH as the coverage seems to be limited to routine acquisition reporting, press releases, passing mentions, etc. M4DU7 (talk) 07:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Portugal-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 07:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:TNT, WP:MILL, WP:SIGCOV, and WP:SPAM. What a mess of a page. This appears to me to be a run of the mill software company. Other than two pages at Oracle, there are zero reliable sources. I think it's spam because a bunch of SPAs have edited it heavily, including, , , and . In 2013, when this page was created, we were lax about spammers, but in 2020, everybody knows not a free web host I will change my !vote if you can convince me otherwise. Bearian (talk) 16:21, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete A promotional piece of content. WP:MILL and WP:SIGCOV. CleanAmbassy (talk) 02:21, 16 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 15:56, 21 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.