Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WeFinance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  12:57, 12 May 2024 (UTC)

WeFinance

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails the notability guideline for companies. Just wanted a second or third pair of eyes on these sources   - I don't think any are suitably reliable or independent, but their coverage would be significant. – Teratix ₵ 11:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Finance, Companies, Websites,  and California. – Teratix ₵ 11:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
 * More or less agree that the three linked sources aren't suitable. Have not yet done my own BEFORE though, so I'll leave the bolded !vote for later. Alpha3031 (t • c) 16:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete. One mention in the NYT, but just that one sentence. Nothing NCORP-relevant, and I assess the chance of any such sources turning up as very unlikely. Also, the article is a brochure, so there's that. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Delete - I found this which would indicate it should have gotten some press, but cannot find anything that meets WP:ORGCRIT so obviously fails NCORP. --CNMall41 (talk) 00:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.