Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Are The Physics


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Notability is blatantly established. (non-admin closure) &mdash; neuro(talk) 20:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

We Are The Physics

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

See Articles for deletion/Colin Kennedy. NON-NOTABLE! The Rolling Camel (talk) 18:00, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete completely non-notable band. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  18:10, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, finding of reviews does push this out of speedy territory, but with one album they still don't pass WP:MUSIC. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:47, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry, but that's absolute nonsense. Mutiple significant coverage in reliable sources is sufficient to pass WP:MUSIC. To quote this guideline: "A musician or ensemble (note that this includes a band, singer, rapper, orchestra, DJ, musical theatre group, etc.) is notable if it meets any one of the following criteria"...one of these criteria (and the most important) being "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable."--Michig (talk) 21:12, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * ..and the coverage found below is not just reviews. There are 5 record reviews, 2 live reviews, 5 interviews, including one on Scottish TV, and a biography at Allmusic.--Michig (talk) 21:27, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. Anyone bothering to go to the effort of a Google search would find an abundance of significant coverage from the likes of the BBC, the NME, Allmusic, The Independent, etc., etc., , , , , , , , , , , , , . Is a little effort before nominating/!voting too much to ask?--Michig (talk) 20:15, 3 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong Keep. Added to what Michig said, there are 7 references on their album page. With that alone they easily pass WP:MUSIC.   Esradekan Gibb    "Talk" 21:36, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 04:13, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep: per Mich and Gibb. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 00:50, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Notability has been established - Boston (talk) 04:02, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep since this coverage is more than enough to pass the notability measure. Drmies (talk) 05:28, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - This article and artist more than meet the notability requirements for Wiki requirements. sheeldz (talk) 12:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
 * keep - clear and obvious notability. Did the nom even bother to google these guys prior to listing this? Grandmartin11 (talk) 16:43, 8 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.