Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Believe the Bible to be the Word of God


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was early closing, delete per WP:SNOWBALL -- The Anome 19:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

We Believe the Bible to be the Word of God

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence that this book is in any way notable. Prod removed without comment by creator. FisherQueen (Talk) 20:20, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability, no sourcing, no verfication. --JodyByak, yak, yak 20:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I believe WP:NOTE to be the word of God and He says Delete. Eleland 20:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the prophet above, and the fact that half of the article is blatant advertising from the author. Non-neutral, clear COI. Hers fold  (t/a/c) 22:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Hersfold. Jakew —The preceding  signed but undated.
 * Delete per JodyB. Dbromage  [Talk]  23:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Smite with brimstone and fire from the Lord out of heaven as patently failing notability criteria and as probably being COI. VanTucky  (talk) 17:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. Bearian 17:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Beorhtric 11:50, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. --Coppertwig 19:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no evidence of notability provided, or any supporting cites. -- The Anome 19:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.