Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Got the Whip


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  08:04, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

We Got the Whip

 * – ( View AfD View log )


 * Delete &mdash; The article does not credibly indicate the importance of the subject. "On rare occasions, a recording&hellip; merits an article of its own." This is not one of those rare occasions. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  01:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC) —  Fly by Night  ( talk )  01:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: – The above statement is the actual nomination for deletion, and not an !vote, as the formatting may suggest. Northamerica1000 (talk) 10:43, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment - See WP:DISCUSSAFD, point number 9: "Nomination already implies that the nominator recommends deletion (unless indicated otherwise), and nominators should refrain from repeating this recommendation on a separate bulleted line." Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:56, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The key phrase here is "&hellip;refrain from repeating&hellip;". Never once have I nominated and then repeated on a "separate bulleted line". I simply choose to bullet my nomination. — Fly by Night  ( talk )  15:30, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 14:54, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Cochise (song). "We Got the Whip" does not appear to be notable on its own (ie, no significant coverage found in reliable sources), but its a plausible search term so I don't mind a redirect to the parent single. Per WP:NSONGS, "Most songs do not rise to notability for an independent article and should redirect to another relevant article..."  Gongshow  Talk 21:41, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete Not a notable song. It should not stand alone.Trongphu (talk) 22:58, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.