Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We Have a Voice


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 21:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

We Have a Voice

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Orphaned article concerning a limited-timescale event of doubtful notability; few substantive edits since early in the article's lifetime and no apparent response to reported issues. Dave.Dunford (talk) 19:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Dave.Dunford (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. Dave.Dunford (talk) 17:40, 15 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2012 August 15.  Snotbot   t &bull; c &raquo;  17:54, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. No notability asserted or found, and I found nothing in the way of reliable sources -- not even locally.  I live in BC and this apparently got little or no local attention.  Ubelowme U  Me  18:10, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was unable to find any reliable sources to show that this student created collection of essays has any notability as far as Wikipedia goes. It seems to have gone the way of most student created anthologies, receiving no coverage from the press and quickly sinking into oblivion. This isn't a knock against it or its intentions, just that very very few student created projects ever receive anything beyond a mention in a local paper, if even that. Given that this was written back in 2005/2006 and it didn't get coverage back then, it's just very unlikely that it will receive enough in the future to warrant a keep. Heck, from what I can figure, this isn't even actually a book, but a collection of blogs . Not that this is a knock against blogs or that they can't become notable, but there doesn't seem to be any actual hard copy of this blog and the blog itself hasn't been updated since 2006, which makes it even more unlikely that it'll get coverage at or beyond this point.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 03:37, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.