Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/We The Gamers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy delete under criterion A7. No notability of the web site is demonstrated, and no independent reliable sources are provided. —C.Fred (talk) 05:11, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

We The Gamers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I don't think this is NN-enough to be A7, but still, it doesn't seem notable to me. — Jonathan 03:22, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I think this article is worthy of keeping. It's completely un-biased, kept to the subject, and at least gives links and citations where needed. Given, yes. I wrote it. But, I kept to the rules that I saw fit. ToxicBeGuile  22:36, 10 December 2007
 * Speedy delete A7, nn web content, no notability asserted, so tagged. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:42, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * We the gamers is an excellent resource for current political gaming discussions. I think it should stay! People need to be motivated to vote and keep our right to freedom of speech. This is a great place to start and get your voice heard. —Preceding unsigned comment added by PMS GI Jane (talk • contribs)  — PMS GI Jane (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete or speedy, it's promotional. Fee Fi Foe Fum (talk) 04:59, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's not promotional. It's completely non-biased. It doesn't say whether it's good. It just reports the facts about the site. ToxicBeGuile (talk) 05:05, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm counting your first comment above as a Keep !vote, please don't !vote twice. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 05:08, 11 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.